All articles

Pace · Blog

Time value of money, explained with one chart (and three formulas)

Your brain draws compounding as a straight line. It is a curve, and the gap between the two is where most money decisions go wrong. A hands-on guide to future value, present value and real returns.

Pace4 min read

Quick: €1,000 grows at 6% a year for 40 years. How much do you end up with?

Most people say something around €3,000 or €3,500. The real answer is about €10,300, three times more. This first hands-on tutorial follows the Wealth Principles series and explains why that guess goes so wrong, and how to do the maths yourself.

The problem: we think in straight lines

Economists Victor Stango and Jonathan Zinman call it exponential growth bias: the tendency to picture compound growth as if it were linear. People with stronger bias underestimate how fast savings grow and how much loans really cost. In their data, more-biased households borrow more and save less.

Your intuition draws a line; compounding draws a curve

The straight-line guess adds €60 a year: €1,000 + 40 × €60 = €3,400. Compounding earns interest on the interest as well, and that gap widens every year.

Formula 1: future value

How much will an amount today be worth later?

FV = PV × (1 + r)ⁿ

  • PV = the amount today
  • r = the return per period (6% = 0.06)
  • n = the number of periods

€1,000 × 1.06⁴⁰ ≈ €10,286.

Compounding frequency matters a little too. €10,000 at 6% for 30 years becomes about €57,400 compounded yearly and about €60,200 compounded monthly.

Formula 2: present value

Turn it around: what is a future amount worth today?

PV = FV ÷ (1 + r)ⁿ

This is the core of every "now or later" decision. Say someone offers you €10,000 today or €12,000 in three years:

If your money can earn €12,000 in 3 years is worth today Better choice
4% a year ≈ €10,670 Wait for €12,000
6% a year ≈ €10,075 Roughly equal
8% a year ≈ €9,526 Take €10,000 now

The answer depends entirely on what you could do with the money in the meantime. That rate is called the discount rate.

Try it now. Think of a choice you are facing: a cash discount for paying upfront, a bonus now vs later, a car lease vs buying. Write down both amounts and the dates, then discount the later one.

Formula 3: the rule of 72

A shortcut for doubling time:

years to double ≈ 72 ÷ annual return in %

Return Rule of 72 Exact
3% 24 years 23.4 years
6% 12 years 11.9 years
8% 9 years 9.0 years
10% 7.2 years 7.3 years

It works the other way too. At 3% inflation, prices double in about 24 years, so your cash buys half as much.

Real vs nominal returns

A return only matters after inflation. Economist Irving Fisher formalised the relationship:

(1 + real) = (1 + nominal) ÷ (1 + inflation)

A 6% nominal return with 3% inflation is a real return of about 2.9%, not 3%. Cash at 0% with 3% inflation is a real return of about −2.9% a year.

What €1,000 kept in cash buys after 10, 25 and 40 years at 3% inflation

That is why our series insists money today is worth more than money in the future: today's euro can be invested, and tomorrow's has already lost some value to inflation.

Putting it to work

  • Starting early beats saving more later. €1,000 a month at an assumed 6% grows to about €462,000 in 20 years but about €1.0M in 30. See your freedom number.
  • Debt compounds too, against you. €3,000 on a card at 20%, paying €90 a month, takes 50 months to clear and costs about €1,400 in interest. See saving rate and consumer debt.
  • Compare in today's money. Discount every future amount before comparing options.

Your checklist

  • Calculate your own FV: current savings × (1 + r)ⁿ for 10, 20 and 30 years.
  • Use the rule of 72 to find your doubling time at your expected return.
  • Work out your real return: nominal return minus inflation, using Fisher's formula.
  • Discount one "now vs later" choice you face this month.

Sources

  • Stango, V. & Zinman, J. (2009). Exponential Growth Bias and Household Finance. Journal of Finance, 64(6), 2807–2849. Link
  • Lusardi, A. & Mitchell, O. S. (2014). The Economic Importance of Financial Literacy: Theory and Evidence. Journal of Economic Literature, 52(1), 5–44. Link
  • Fisher, I. (1930). The Theory of Interest. New York: Macmillan.

Educational content, not financial advice. Returns are illustrations, not forecasts. Investing carries the risk of loss.